You’re gearing up for your next marathon or just want to track your daily runs more accurately. You’ve narrowed it down to the COROS Pace 2 and the Garmin 165, two popular choices that promise to enhance your fitness journey. Let’s break down which one might suit you better.
| Feature | COROS Pace 2 | Garmin 165 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | 30 hours (GPS) | 20 hours (GPS) |
| Weight | 29g | 42g |
| Water Resistance | ✓ 5 ATM | ✓ 5 ATM |
| Heart Rate Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Music Storage | ✗ | ✓ |
| Advanced Metrics | ✓ | ✓ |
✅ coros pace 2 Pros
- Incredible 30-hour battery life.
- Extremely lightweight at just 29g.
- Competitive price point.
❌ coros pace 2 Cons
- Lacks music storage capabilities.
- Limited smartwatch features.
✅ garmin 165 Pros
- Includes music storage.
- Robust ecosystem with Garmin Connect.
- Solid build quality.
❌ garmin 165 Cons
- Heavier at 42g.
- Shorter battery life for GPS tracking.
Performance and Battery Life
When you’re out on a long run, the last thing you want is your watch dying on you. The COROS Pace 2 is unbeatable here with its 30-hour GPS battery life. If you’re the kind of runner who loves ultramarathons or just hates charging devices, the Pace 2 will be your best running buddy. Meanwhile, the Garmin 165, with its 20-hour battery, is decent but not groundbreaking. For most casual runners, this will suffice, but if you push the limits, you might find it lacking.
Build Quality and Ergonomics
The COROS Pace 2 feels almost feather-like on your wrist, which is fantastic for long-distance runners who value minimalism. The Garmin 165, although heavier, offers a more robust feel, which might appeal to you if you’re concerned about durability. Both watches come with a durable 5 ATM water resistance rating, but the Garmin’s added weight makes it feel more substantial, especially if you’re going to use it beyond just running.
Features and Ecosystem
The Garmin 165 shines with its music storage option, allowing you to leave your phone at home and still groove to your power playlist. It also integrates seamlessly with the Garmin Connect app, providing a holistic approach to fitness tracking. The COROS Pace 2 focuses on delivering core running metrics with precision. If you’re a data nerd who’s less concerned with music, the Pace 2’s advanced metrics and algorithmic accuracy could appeal more to your analytical side.
The COROS Pace 2 is fantastic for pure runners, but if you need more smartwatch features like notifications or music, you might feel limited. The Garmin 165 offers a broader range of features, but its ecosystem can feel overwhelming if you’re just looking for straightforward tracking. Be clear on what you need before you buy.
Our Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?
If you’re a dedicated runner focused on performance metrics and you hate frequent charging, get the COROS Pace 2. It’s perfect for the minimalist athlete. For those who want a more versatile experience with music and a robust app ecosystem, the Garmin 165 is your go-to, especially if you value the added features and don’t mind charging slightly more often.
Does the COROS Pace 2 fit smaller wrists comfortably?
Yes, its lightweight design and adjustable bands make it suitable for smaller wrists without feeling cumbersome.
Is the Garmin 165 compatible with third-party apps?
Yes, the Garmin 165 supports a variety of third-party apps through the Garmin Connect IQ store, enhancing its functionality.
How durable are these watches for outdoor activities?
Both watches are built for durability with 5 ATM water resistance, but the Garmin 165 feels sturdier due to its heavier build.
